A task for the rep, with the commitment recorded in the deal
The full picture for your sales leader
Sales funnel
Conversation
Qualification
Proposal
Deal
Performance trends
Conversion · revenue · team
From causes to managing outcomes
Analysis, actions and metrics in one view
A demonstration of Aplora Sales capabilities. Charts are illustrative, not client results or a growth forecast.
How your growth becomes manageable
Expertise, speed and proven methodologies, combined with AI, turn analytical data into a plan of action — and that plan into profit growth.
Three steps in sequence — first model the economics, then embed into the processes, then watch what happens as it happens. An equals sign leads to the fourth block: those three steps add up to profit growth.
First we count
The economics and the solution are built on analysis and validated before any rollout begins.
Then we embed
The solution is taken to a result inside your processes rather than left on paper.
We control everything
We watch what happens as it happens: metrics, actions, and their effect on revenue.
And we deliver growth
More efficient commercial processes return more profit.
=
AploraOther approaches
Diagnosesteps 1 of 6steps 1 of 6
Modelsteps 2 of 6steps 2 of 6
Prioritisesteps 3 of 6partly: 3
Validatesteps 4 of 6partly: 4
Implementsteps 5 of 6partly: 5
Scalesteps 6 of 6—
Aplora
steps 1–6 of 6
From baseline to scale
Other approaches
steps 1, 2 of 6; partly: 3, 4, 5
No end-to-end delivery: separate services that stop short of a result
AI has levelled the playing field
Big data is no longer the privilege of big companies. What was once available only to corporations is now within your reach with AI.
AI is discussed at every conference. Yet in most companies it remains a demo feature — a chatbot, a couple of agents, or simply a polished presentation.
Conference context photo · Process illustration
Data
AI analysis
Action
Metric
Aplora is not AI for AI’s sake.
Every implementation is tied to a specific profit growth metric: we measure the effect and refine the solution until it delivers a result.
Aplora turns this opportunity into concrete solutions for your business: without an in-house data team or years of investment in infrastructure.
AI has levelled the playing field: Before / Now
Criterion
Before
Now
Who could afford it
BeforeOnly corporations: analytics departments, data scientists and BI systems
NowAny business — without hiring a separate team
How decisions were made
BeforeBased on experience, intuition and retrospective reports
NowBased on data visible in the moment
Cost of getting started
BeforeMonths of implementation and expensive infrastructure
NowWeeks, without capital investment in infrastructure
Real results from clients we work with
We always take what we set out to do through to a result.
B2B, Light manufacturing
Losses$51,000
The client's own estimate of deals lost during the assessment period
Where deals and resources were lost
No access to the decision-maker
Qualifying data not collected
No next step agreed
Objections left unanswered
The call is never reviewed afterwards
Relative weight of drivers, not a share of monetary losses
Aplora Sales
+25%Conversion to a sale three months after rollout
+72%Conversion to a sale after six months
Client figures: compared with the pre-rollout period in the same funnel
Details & testimonial+
The team's result rested on two people; the rest closed several times less on the same workload. Nobody knew what exactly the leaders did differently: conversations were not reviewed, and the gap was explained away as “experience”.
«Even before we rolled out Aplora Sales, the assessment report showed us what our best salespeople actually do differently. We set out to scale that across the whole team, so that every rep works like the best one. The result did not keep us waiting: three months after the rollout conversion was up 25%, and after six months — 72%. And that was only one of the twenty constraints Aplora pointed out to us.»
A few recordings a month are reviewed out of hundreds
The reasons for a no stay a hypothesis
Commitments are captured from memory
The CRM is filled in after the fact and only partially
Relative weight of drivers, not a share of monetary losses
Aplora Sales
×3.3Conversion from hot leads
−40 ppShare of calls that went nowhere
LearnIT figures, CommaCRM export
Details+
Conversation quality was judged from a few recordings a month. The reasons for a no stayed a hypothesis, commitments were captured from memory, and the CRM was filled in after the fact and only partially.
Channels are compared on cost per lead, not on the sale
A cheap channel wins by bringing people who don't buy
Nobody counts the losses between stages
Marketing and sales draw the funnel differently
Relative weight of drivers, not a share of monetary losses
Aplora Sales
×3 in Google's favourGoogle versus Facebook lead quality by conversion to sale
×4–5Conversion at four or more touches versus one
An observation from LearnIT's own funnel data over the period reviewed
Details & testimonial+
Channels were compared on cost per lead rather than on the eventual sale, so a cheap channel looked better than an expensive one even when it brought people who don't buy. Nobody counted the losses between stages: for marketing the funnel ended at the webinar, for sales it began at the call.
«For the first time we saw the whole funnel: it became clear where we lose money and what to actually do — where to move budget, whom to follow up and which touches genuinely produce sales.»
The knowledge base goes stale faster than it is fixed
More volume runs straight into hiring more operators
Relative weight of drivers, not a share of monetary losses
AI Workflow Automation
−25–40%Enquiries that reach an operator
−30–50%Ticket handling time
Client figures: before and after on the same support channels, adjusted for seasonality
Details & testimonial+
Operators were absorbed by repeat questions, complex enquiries got lost in the queue, and the knowledge base went stale faster than anyone could fix it.
«We used to just hire people. Now half the routine questions close themselves and the operators work the hard cases.»
8–10 days a month go into reports instead of projects
Approvals drag, and payments move with them
Every new client means overtime or a hire
Figures in the report disagree between sources
Relative weight of drivers, not a share of monetary losses
Document & Reporting Automation
10 days → 5 minutesTime to prepare a monthly report
+30%Projects handled by the same team
Agency figures: a before-and-after measurement of the process
Details & testimonial+
For the first 8–10 days of the month the team assembled reports instead of doing project work. Approvals dragged, payments moved with them, and every new client meant either overtime or a hire.
«The first 8–10 days of the month used to go into reporting. Now reports assemble in minutes, everything is standardised and transparent, and the team spends its time on client results rather than manual assembly.»
The load on methodologists grows faster than the team
The product ages between releases
A student sees an example on a library version that no longer exists
Relative weight of drivers, not a share of monetary losses
Document & Reporting Automation
×10Speed of releasing and updating material
−50%Share of manual work in content production
Client figures: measured on preparing material against an existing course standard, not on designing a syllabus from scratch
Details & testimonial+
A new module or an update took weeks. The load on methodologists grew faster than the team, and the product aged between releases: a student would see an example on a library version that no longer exists.
«Updates and new modules used to take weeks and consume the methodologists. Now content ships faster, to a standard, and with a clear quality gate.»
Applications have no priority — strong leads are lost in the queue
Conversation quality is checked on a sample
Follow-up depends on whether the advisor remembers
The manager spends hours listening to recordings
Relative weight of drivers, not a share of monetary losses
Aplora Sales
+22%Progression to a second contact
+5 ppOverall conversion to a deal
Client figures: before and after within the same sales funnel
Details & testimonial+
There was no priority, and strong leads were lost in the queue. Conversation quality was checked on a sample, follow-up depended on whether the advisor remembered, and the manager spent hours listening to recordings instead of working the bottlenecks.
«Everything is transparent now: I see the bottlenecks and the reasons for losses immediately, without hours of review. The team focuses on deals and I focus on where the growth is.»
The logos are systems we have already integrated with. Anything else we check during the assessment: what matters is not only that an API exists, but which fields are writable.
Who it is for
Clear value for the roles that run the company
Every commercial function grows with Aplora: each role has its own job and its own question the data cannot answer today.
Owner and CEO
Predictable revenue and profit growth
You no longer have to guess why revenue was there yesterday and gone today. Aplora shows what is actually happening instead of another monthly round of blame between sales and marketing. You see the real causes and know what to do to keep growth going.
The commercial director owns the funnel end to end — from lead to closed deal — yet the data about it usually lives in different people's heads. Aplora assembles that commercial system on data, so decisions come from metrics rather than recollection.
The gap between the best and the average exists in every department, but nobody usually prices it. Once the work is described in measurable terms, the difference between best-case and average stops being a feeling and becomes an amount.
Aplora finds what exactly your best rep does differently and turns it into a model the whole team applies — the expertise stops living in one head and reaches everyone in the department.
02
Less manual control, more manageability
The head of sales sees who is losing deals and why, which leads to work first, and gets an objective picture without hours spent listening to calls and assembling reports by hand.
03
New hires reach quota sooner
Every rep gets a review of their own calls and a concrete development path instead of anecdotes retold at the standup — onboarding stops depending on the manager's personal time.
Every stage produces an artefact that stays with you and a decision that is taken on it. Even if you carry on without us, the stage has already returned something.
Every stage produces an artefact that stays with you and a decision that is taken on it. Even if you carry on without us, the stage has already returned something.
Thirty to forty-five minutes about one specific workflow: what happens in it today, where it limits the business, what data and systems exist. We clarify the business problem, check whether the task fits what we do, and decide with you whether a next step makes sense. It is not a full opportunity map of your company — one call does not produce that.
What is free and what counts as paid assessment?
The first meeting is free: clarifying the problem, checking fit, forming an initial view of data and systems, and deciding on a next step. A paid assessment means interviews with process owners, a study of data and systems, a fixed baseline, an opportunity map, economic hypotheses, prioritisation, architecture options, risks and a validation plan. The difference is scope of work, not quality of attention.
How is the first workflow chosen?
Against seven criteria: what loss or constraint it removes, how often the operation repeats, what data is available and usable, what happens when it goes wrong, which systems are involved, who will use the result, and what baseline can be fixed. A workflow that fails on data or on ownership does not go first, however visible it looks.
What if the hypothesis doesn't hold?
That is a legitimate and useful outcome. The stop criterion is defined before validation starts, alongside the baseline and the target. If the hypothesis fails, we show exactly what did not work and why, and that knowledge carries into the next initiative. Stretching a pilot in the hope the numbers will arrive on their own costs more than stopping.
How much time will it take from our team?
Most during assessment and calibration: interviews with process owners, access to data, and working through contested cases with us. Involvement drops after that but never reaches zero — the solution needs an owner on your side, or it will not survive the first process change. The actual load depends on the workflow and is estimated before work begins, not discovered along the way.
What data do you need?
Only what the workflow cannot be understood without: for conversation analysis, recordings and scoring criteria; for documents, the sources of each value and the templates; for routing, request history and rules. Scope is minimised rather than collected just in case. If the data isn't there or isn't usable, we say so before work starts.
How is security handled?
Data minimisation, encryption in transit and at rest, role-based access, access logging, an agreed retention period and deletion procedure. The hosting model is chosen to fit your requirements, including running inside your own perimeter. Specific terms are fixed in the contract before work begins.
Can you work with our CRM or ERP?
We work with systems that expose an API or another workable exchange route — exports, direct database access, file drops — including in-house builds. We check yours during the assessment: what matters is not just that an API exists, but which fields are writable and how permissions work. Promising an integration before that check would not be honest.
Who owns the code and the data?
The data stays yours. Rights to the solution are fixed in the contract before work begins — our default position is that you must be able to keep running and developing it without us. We hold the architecture to the same requirement: the solution should not depend on a single vendor, ourselves included.
What happens after go-live?
Go-live is not the end of the work. What follows is measuring the actual effect over an agreed period, monitoring quality and cost, clearing exceptions, and deciding whether to scale or stop. If you want us to run that, it is a separate ongoing engagement with regular prioritisation and executive reporting. If you want to run it yourselves, we hand over documentation and train the solution owner.
Grow your profit with an AI partner that delivers
We will show what Aplora does on real scenarios, answer your questions, and discuss how we can help you get to a result.